Thanks to the Birth Activist for putting all these videos in one convenient place.
Lamaze, InJoy, and Mother’s Advocate put out these videos based on the Healthy Birth Practices.
Thanks to the Birth Activist for putting all these videos in one convenient place.
Lamaze, InJoy, and Mother’s Advocate put out these videos based on the Healthy Birth Practices.
Posted in Resources, video | 1 Comment »
After reading this,
ACT NOW!
Time is limited! Call and write before Tuesday, when voting will take place.
The AMA has proposed a resolution that would allow them to create billing codes that would categorize any disagreement and exercise of autonomy on the part of the patient as “non-compliance,” “abuse” or “hostility,” creating a pathway for insurance companies to deny coverage to patients. Because there is not a “one-size-fits-all” approach to medical care, the use of these labels fails to recognize patients as partners in their own care and may jeopardize their ability to find other care providers. If patients are faced with the consequences of this, their rights to informed consent and refusal are threatened. The AMA will vote on this resolution this week, so we must act NOW. Here’s what you can do:
Posted in ICAN news, In the news / Releases, Resources | Leave a Comment »
Most people remember this episode of Seinfeld:
Gotta wonder if the late-night reruns launched this “great” idea:
AMA Resolution Would Seek to Label “Ungrateful” Patients
Redondo Beach, CA, June 11, 2009 – At the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Annual Meeting next week, delegates will vote on a resolution which proposes to develop CPT (billing) codes to identify and label “non-compliant” patients (1)
The resolution complains:
“The stress of dealing with ungrateful patients is adding to the stress of physicians leading to decreased physician satisfaction.”
“This resolution is alarming in its arrogance and its failure to recognize, or even pay lip service to, patient autonomy,” said Desirre Andrews, the newly elected president of the International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN).
If approved, the resolution could hold implications for women receiving maternity care. For pregnant women seeking quality care and good outcomes, “non-compliance” is often their only alternative to accepting sub-standard care. Physicians routinely order interventions like induction, episiotomy, or cesarean section unnecessarily.
Liz Dutzy, a mother from Olathe, Kansas, delivered her first two babies by cesarean and was told by her obstetrician that she needed another surgical delivery. “My doctor told me that I needed to have a cesarean delivery at 39 weeks, or my uterus would rupture and my baby would die.” She sought out another care provider and had a healthy and safe intervention-free {home} birth at 41 weeks and 3 days gestation.
A recent report by Childbirth Connection and The Milbank Memorial Fund, called “Evidence-Based Maternity Care: What It Is and What It Can Achieve ,” (2) shows that the state of maternity care in the U.S. is worrisome, driven largely by a failure of care providers to heed evidence-based care practices. For most women in the U.S., care practices that have been proven to make childbirth easier and safer are underused, and interventions that may increase risks to mothers and babies are routinely overused. The authors of the report point to the “perinatal paradox” of doing more, but accomplishing less.
The resolution proposed by the Michigan delegation of the AMA could threaten patient care and patient autonomy for several reasons:
• Billing codes that would categorize any disagreement and exercise of autonomy on the part of the patient as “non-compliance” “abuse” or “hostility” could create a pathway for insurance companies to deny coverage to patients
• Use of these labels fails to recognize patients as competent partners with physicians in their own care
• Tagging patients as “non-compliant” fails to recognize that there is not a “one size fits all” approach to care, that different opinions among physicians abound, and that patients are entitled to these very same differences of opinion
• Labeling patients as “non-compliant” may, in fact, be punitive, jeopardizing a patient’s ability to seek out other care providers
The resolution also fails to address how it would implicate patients navigating controversial issues in medical care, like vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). While a substantive body of medical research demonstrates that VBAC is reasonably safe, if not safer, than repeat cesareans, most physicians and hospitals refuse to support VBAC. (3) The language in the resolution suggests that patients who assert their right to opt for VBAC could be tagged as non-compliant, even though their choice would be consistent with the medical research.
“The reality is that the balance of power in the physician-patient relationship is decidedly tipped towards physicians. The least patients should have is the right to disagree with their doctors and not be labeled a ‘naughty’ patient,” said Andrews.
About Cesareans: When a cesarean is medically necessary, it can be a lifesaving technique for both mother and baby, and worth the risks involved. Potential risks to babies from cesareans include: low birth weight, prematurity, respiratory problems, and lacerations. Potential risks to women include: hemorrhage, infection, hysterectomy, surgical mistakes, re-hospitalization, dangerous placental abnormalities in future pregnancies, unexplained stillbirth in future pregnancies and increased percentage of maternal death.
Mission statement: ICAN is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to improve maternal-child health by preventing unnecessary cesareans through education, providing support for cesarean recovery and promoting vaginal birth after cesarean. ICAN has 110 chapters in North America and Europe, which hold educational and support meetings for people interested in cesarean prevention and recovery.
(1) Resolution 710 “Identifying Abusive, Hostile or Non-Compliant Patients”
(2) Evidence-Based Maternity Care: What It Is and What It Can Achieve
(3) http://www.ican-online.org/ican-in-the-news/trouble-repeat-cesareans
Posted in ICAN news, In the news / Releases, Press Release | 1 Comment »
Check out the Birth Activist’s post on a Free Webinar on Informed Consent & Refusal in Maternity Care through CIMS
Posted in Resources | Leave a Comment »
CONTACT: Denna Suko, Executive Director
Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
Tel: 919.863.9482
dsuko@motherfriendly.org
Choosing a Birth Care Provider? The Birth Survey Now Offers Access to Reviews of Local Maternity Care Providers and Facilities.
Raleigh, NC April 28th, 2009 —CIMS, the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services, a group working toward transparency in maternity care, today announced that consumer survey results rating health care providers and birth facilities are now available online at www.thebirthsurvey.com.
The CIMS Transparency in Maternity Care Project: The Birth Survey is the first ever consumer ratings website dedicated solely to providing feedback on obstetricians, midwives, hospitals, birth centers, and home birth services. The consumer reviews include overall ratings and recommendations for birth facilities and care providers, and also a seven-item set of questions on providers’ interpersonal and communication skills, facility intervention rates, and information on finding good care. A national average of ratings is also displayed to provide comparison with individual ratings.
“While consumers have long been sharing information online about products and services, more data was available for the purchase of a digital camera than had ever been available to women as consumers of maternity care. The Birth Survey directly addresses that information deficit,” said Robin Elise Weiss, LCCE, author of The Complete Illustrated Guide to Pregnancy and member of The Birth Survey Committee.
The Birth Survey is a user-friendly, free Website where mothers who have given birth within the last three years can provide detailed, anonymous feedback about their experiences. The survey questions are based upon the Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative, an evidence-based model of high quality maternity care. Additionally, the interpersonal and communication questions are based upon an AHRQ survey, which represents a well known set of questions currently used by doctors and hospitals.
More than 17,500 ratings for providers and 6,500 ratings for facilities have been submitted since the national launch six months ago. Now, parents-to-be can retrieve the pooled reporting on local providers and facilities.
The national averages of the consumer feedback collected indicate that midwives were rated more highly than the physicians. For example, 58 percent of respondents would recommend their doctors to family and friends, compared to 90 percent who would recommend their midwives. Across all providers, 77 percent of women reported that they had their questions answered completely, and 73 percent felt they were as free as they wanted to be in making their own decisions about their care. Averages, however, varied widely between individual providers.
The Website ratings pages also provide links to hospital and birth center obstetric intervention rates, such as c-section, for facilities in nine states. This information is part of The Birth Survey’s nationwide campaign to make facility-level intervention data available to the public. This kind of public reporting supports informed choice and fosters transparency, which improves outcomes.
Consistent with a new series of government Public Service announcements that encourage consumers to get involved in their health care and ask questions of their care providers, The Birth Survey offers links to information on how to choose and evaluate providers, including the “CIMS Ten Questions to Ask.” By offering more than a conventional five-star rating, The Birth Survey offers information that is vital for women to make more informed decisions.
“A woman who looks at a list of names from her insurance company is often choosing a provider on nothing but blind luck. Where and with whom to give birth are important health care decisions. Research shows that both provider and location have a significant impact on birth outcomes. CIMS wants expectant parents to ask questions of their providers and facilities, and have access to more information about their local options,” said Elan McAllister, founder of Choices in Childbirth in New York City and Co-chair of the The Birth Survey committee.
The Birth Survey is an ongoing project. In the summer of 2009, free-text responses will be displayed on the website, and in 2010, detailed information on patients’ experiences with prenatal, labor, birth and postpartum care will be added to the website as searchable custom reports.
###
For more about The Birth Survey, to view intervention data for each state, the survey results, or to take the survey, log on to http://www.thebirthsurvey.com.
About the Transparency in Maternity Care Project:
The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services CIMS) through the Transparency in Maternity Care Project developed The Birth Survey so families can share information, learn about the choices and birth experiences of others, and view data on hospital and birth center intervention rates and practices. It is also designed to help providers and facilities improve the quality and transparency of their care. At the heart of the project is an on-going online consumer survey that asks women to provide feedback about their pregnancy and birth care specific to the particular doctor, midwife, hospital or birth center that served them. Responses are made available online to other women in their community who are deciding where and with whom to birth. Paired with this experiential data, are official statistics from state departments- of-health listing obstetrical intervention rates at the facility level.
About the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services: The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) is a coalition of individuals and national organizations with concern for the care and well-being of mothers, babies, and families. Our mission is to promote a wellness model of maternity care that will improve birth outcomes and substantially reduce costs. This evidence-based mother-, baby-, and family-friendly model focuses on prevention and wellness as the alternatives to high-cost screening, diagnosis, and treatment programs. For more information, log on to http://www.motherfriendly.org/.
Posted in In the news / Releases, Press Release | Leave a Comment »

Hope to see you at Birth Care Network’s Birth in the Bluegrass on June 13th. ICAN of Louisville will be there, so please stop by and introduce yourself.
Posted in Chapter Update, Louisville-area events | Leave a Comment »

Go viral!
Visit ICAN of Louisville on Facebook. Use your MySpace, Twitter, and Facebook accounts to share ICAN event info, studies, new stories, etc.
Blog! And comment on others’ blog entries.
Posted in April is Cesarean Awareness Month | Leave a Comment »
Take time to sit and write a letter to any OB you’ve seen for care in your life. Let him/her know how important cesarean prevention, especially when encouraged from a woman’s care provider. Explain your desire to see VBAC become commonplace in our area, and encourage him/her to practice use evidence-based medicine and research when determining their vbac policies.
If you’re comfortable, and if applicable, share your personal cesarean or vbac stories. Let the doctor know how the experience(s) affected you after the 6-week check-up mark.
Posted in April is Cesarean Awareness Month | Leave a Comment »
BABIES born by elective caesarean are almost 2½ times more likely to die within their first month than babies born vaginally, researchers have found, adding weight to the argument that caesareans should only be carried out in emergencies.
The study, which involved more than 8 million births in the US over four years, is the first of its kind to focus on full-term babies born to women with no medical reason for choosing a caesarean over a vaginal delivery, an increasingly common phenomenon in Australia.
One in three babies is now born by caesarean section, up from about one in five 10 years ago, but those born before the onset of labour are often unresponsive and unable to breathe without help.
They are frequently admitted to neonatal intensive care units because their lungs cannot eliminate secretions and they lack catecholamines, a vital chemical secreted during labour that keeps them alert and eager to feed.
“We are designed to give birth vaginally. When will people wake up and realise this?” the secretary of the NSW Midwives Association, Hannah Dahlen, said yesterday. “When a baby is born vaginally, fluid is squeezed out of the lungs as it is pushed through the birth canal. The baby can then inhale with clean lungs, aerating its blood supply and kick-starting its circulation. A baby born by caesarean quite often comes out gurgling because its lungs are full of fluid, requires suction and is non-responsive because it lacks the hormonal surge delivered during labour.”
But babies born vaginally with high levels of catecholamines were usually alert and quick to seek out their mother’s breast. “They’ve got that ‘wow, I’m alive and I’m ready to go’ response.”
The study, published in the international journal Birth, only included women who had not had a previous caesarean; were giving birth to a single baby which was head down in the cervix; were between 37 and 41 weeks gestation and had none of the 16 common risk factors, such as diabetes or hypertension, associated with birth complications, in a bid to ensure that only low-risk births were evaluated.
It found the mortality rate for babies born vaginally was less than one in 1000 births while the rate for elective caesareans was 1.73 per 1000. A professor in obstetrics and gynaecology at the Australian National University medical school, David Ellwood, said the risk was still very small. “We have enough evidence now to know that caesareans should only be done when there is a medical indication, but when you look at the overall risk here, it is not that high.”
The clinical director of women’s and children’s health at the Sydney South West Area Health Service, Andrew Child, said the study should be treated with caution. “It’s been done by statisticians, not obstetricians or midwives,” he said.
Carolyn Constantian, 43, of Chatswood, delivered her twins, Amelie and Remy, by caesarean two weeks ago, but said she would have chosen a natural birth if she had been given an option. “I had to have a caesarean 2½ years ago when my daughter was born breech, but I tried everything to turn her around so I could give birth naturally. I just didn’t feel comfortable about having a caesarean then. Nor did I this time, but you have to do what’s right for your child.”
Source: The Sydney Morning Herald
Posted in In the news / Releases, cesarean risks | Leave a Comment »

Write thank you notes to VBAC-friendly doctors and midwives in the area. Thank them for being supportive of normal birth after a cesarean, and for giving local women the option to choose a safer start for their children.
If you’d like help compiling your list of VBAC-friendly providers, feel free to contact us.
Posted in April is Cesarean Awareness Month | Leave a Comment »